S scientists reported that they had succeeded in isolating and culturing stem cells obtained from human embryos and fetuses. Thus, killing a recently fertilized embryo is not murder of a human person. Political, not prudent considerations are the cause of the stifling of embryonic stem cell research. Worried about plagiarism? We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. In alone, more thanabortions were performed in the U, stem cell research pros and cons essay. Select a referencing style:.
Introduction
Worried about plagiarism? Read this, stem cell research pros and cons essay. Help Login Sign Up. Is stem cell research pros and cons essay ethical to favor the killing of unborn babies in order to extract their stem cells for medical research? The word ethics is a theory or system of moral values; the discipline dealing with what is good or bad and with moral duty and obligation. We find that the moral and ethical standings are tested when scientist and theologist go head to head in the debate over "stem stem cell research pros and cons essay research".
In Novembertwo independent teams U. S scientists reported that they had succeeded in isolating and culturing stem cells obtained from human embryos and fetuses. Because many diseases result from the death or dysfunction of a single cell type, scientists believe that the introduction of healthy cells of this type into a patient may restore lost or compromised function. The research of stem cells is a new study proving the a stem cell a primitive type of cell can be coaxed into developing into most types of cells found in the human body. However, ethics comes into play when we are faced with the legitimate question regarding either side of the positive and negative opinion, the problem truly lies in the actually source of the stem cells.
Those who are considered pro-choice regard that human personhood to occur much later in the pregnancy. Thus, killing a recently fertilized embryo is not murder of a human person. In April ofSenators Arlen Spector and Tom Harkin introduced the Stem Cell Research Act of This would allow federal researchers to extract stem cells from embryos. They believe this research to be ethical and definitely beneficial. In fertility clinics, women are given a choice of what to do with unused fertilized embryos; they can be discarded, donated to research or frozen for future use. Under the specific This essay is about the PROS and CONS of Stem Cell Research. In WriteWork. WriteWork contributors.
com, 03 June, WriteWork contributors, "This essay is about the PROS and CONS of Stem Cell Research.
essay on the necklace
Those who are considered pro-choice regard that human personhood to occur much later in the pregnancy. Thus, killing a recently fertilized embryo is not murder of a human person. In April of , Senators Arlen Spector and Tom Harkin introduced the Stem Cell Research Act of This would allow federal researchers to extract stem cells from embryos. They believe this research to be ethical and definitely beneficial. In fertility clinics, women are given a choice of what to do with unused fertilized embryos; they can be discarded, donated to research or frozen for future use. Under the specific This essay is about the PROS and CONS of Stem Cell Research..
In WriteWork. WriteWork contributors. com, 03 June, The benefits to society by the introduction of new medical technologies have been considerable. For example, the introduction of vaccines and antibiotics has significantly improved the well-being of people all over the globe. The science of stem cell treatments, potentially as or more significant than these other innovations, is beginning a new stage of exploration and growth that could be the forerunner of unprecedented cures and therapies. The present enthusiasm over prospective stem cell-produced remedies radiates from the new innovations of genetic biology. Though one cannot forecast the results from basic research, there is enough information available to suggest that a good deal of this enthusiasm is justified.
The moral dilemma that surrounds the prohibition of aborted fetuses is the idea of abortion itself. Why would pro-lifers want to witness what they believe is a living being tossed away in vain? In alone, more than , abortions were performed in the U. Elam-Evans et al, Whatever moral or political position, the fact is, all these fetuses could have served advance scientific and medical knowledge in immeasurable ways. Abortion laws vary state by state but the vast majority allow for abortions to be performed at least through the second trimester, 24 weeks into the pregnancy. This same definition must therefore also define life as there are no alternatives to these two options.
The presence of the EEG pattern of a fetus can be detected approximately 27 weeks into the pregnancy. An embryo is referred to as a fetus at about seven to eight weeks following fertilization. More than half of European countries and others around the world such as Japan allow for embryonic stem cell research in various degrees. According to Health-Day, a daily news service reporting on consumer health, Swiss physicians at the University of Lausanne discovered that a two-and-a-half-inch piece of skin from a fetus, which was aborted at 14 weeks, provided several million grafts that were used to treat burn victims. The study also found that skin cells from an aborted fetus healed burns faster than standard grafts.
Scientists provide the valid argument that embryos cannot be considered humans because of their stage of development. Embryonic stem cells are collected from embryos that are four to five days old. In this stage of development, they are called blastocysts and are smaller in diameter than a human hair. When viewed by a microscope, the blastocyst contains fewer than cells and had no features that are recognizable as human nor has the capacity to feel any sensations including pain. An embryo only four or five days old does not yet contain any cells that are dedicated to making up bodily tissues.
Therefore, the viability of the embryo is certainly not assured and is, in fact, unlikely. It can be argued that it could not possess a soul as well, at least not an individual soul. Political, not prudent considerations are the cause of the stifling of embryonic stem cell research. Other countries will be much further advanced in this science and therefore reap the financial benefits. This is likely the result of refusing to become educated on the issue while employing a neutral, unbiased frame of mind. Inevitably, stem cell research will be commonplace and hopefully sooner than later but until then many people will continue to suffer from debilitating diseases and paralysis.
Where is the morality in that? Who are these people that consider the life of a living human being less important than a four or five-day-old embryo? Elam-Evans, Laurie D.
No comments:
Post a Comment